Any writing of course can be used in any manner by any critics in order to best fit the thesis. We no longer wish to participate in the critical destruction of one event in order to replace it by the hubris of another. Any pretexts have further stories and will always introduce other examples of ‘resistance’. Remember though, any talk of after-ideology is not the end of ideology just a more flexible approach which is likely to devour itself, out of a sense of the exhaustion all around. Provocation is not only gradual but inevitable; within it are the answers only if these are accepted and read. Language itself is part of this ‘movement’. Otherwise we would be guilty of sophisticated yet grandly deceptive counter-strategies utilizing the same language and procedures so heavily dashed and disliked. The very condition to ‘combat’ any limitations in the current condition of spectacular, potential and splendidly redundant contemporary architecture can only be part of the multiple strategies that work in ‘combat’. Success cannot be defined in advance.